There have been a couple big reasons for my lapse in posting.
First, as happens about once a year, an overly out-of-control youngster attempts to kick a soccer ball while it is in my possession (hands, I'm a goalkeeper) and, instead, kicks me. And, by kick, I mean this latest was a Chuck Norris roundhouse into the kidney. The ball was five feet off the ground; there was never a chance the ball would be kicked.
So, I haven't felt like doing much of anything, let alone breathing or typing. I'm mending and I think I'm a couple of days away from being able to stand up straight again.
It's put a blow into my continued hope for a goalkeeper glove endorsement deal ("Your election's in good hands.")
Second, it's been incredibly busy, and busy in a "there's so many things I could blog about" way.
We've got budget, postal, Photo ID/citizenship, and planning things going on and I need to provide updates on all of them.
I'll take the easy one quickly here.
We again have a friend at the Postal Service. It's our same friend, actually, who saved us during the winter blizzard election from our local Post Office that delivers excuses more frequently than ballots.
He'd been unreachable during the beginning of our Olathe Mail Ballot election and I worried he had moved on, taking a new job.
But, no! We connected and he did some sleuthing on his own and drew the same conclusions I had.
I guess that's bad and good news. We're just a few weeks from getting our ballots ready for the largest mail-ballot election in county history, so it's definitely good news that he's dialed in.
Next week, I'll be traveling to an election geekfest in Washington for a day to talk about some of the issues that triggered the formation of the Presidential Commission on Election Administration.
So, I hope to have a few updates next week. For now, back to wheezing.
Saturday, June 15, 2013
Advance Voting,
Budget,
Polling Places
0
comments
Pinching Voters and Budgets
This week's election contained some irony.
The election involved the Olathe School District and a capital improvement plan that passed overwhelmingly.
The projects included a new high school and improved security at all schools.
I read today that the district plans "Pinch Points" at each school. I really like this new phrase linguistically but operationally, I think this points to further doom for us at the election office.
Pinch Points refers to the concept that visitors to a school have to come through a secure entrance, basically being buzzed in. This, of course, would be unworkable when using schools as polling places.
Hence the irony. An election conducted by our office for the district likely will result in the district not being able to support the election office.
I could be wrong, and, of course, this is becoming a tired message on this blog. Namely, schools' concerns with safety, voters' concerns with churches, reduced post office service levels, and increased voter expectations for advance voting locations form the largest restrainers we have to conducting elections.
Late this year, we will go through the process of assigning polling places for 2014 elections. That's when these points may start pinching.
This event coincides with our budget process and data related to the 2012 election. In 2012, the county conducted small focus groups and an online budget-cut simulation. One conclusion drawn was that people were willing to wait in line longer to vote. There was encouragement by the county manager and some members of the Board of County Commissioners to reduce polling places.
I was publicly skeptical of this conclusion. In fact, the online simulation that asked residents how they would balance the budget started with questions about the election office and the DMV. We know, of course, the impact of "top of the ballot," in elections (that's why we rotate candidate names). The design of the simulation likely created some false positives.
The same process said that waiting longer at the DMV was okay and thanks to a new computer system put in place in 2012, the DMV's "brand" has been severely damaged. Wait times there were measured in hours, not minutes.
Fact is, though, we were reducing polling places, anyway. It was the first time, presidential-election to presidential-election, that polling places decreased rather than increased. It was a signal of availability, not of my reaction to the focus groups.
I'm a pretty independent person and if I thought increasing polling places was the right thing to do, I would have, and then I would have dealt with the fall-out within the county. I said this during my budget presentation last June. In fairness, nobody "made me" reduce polling places. Further, I didn't quit some polling places--they quit us.
But, now we have new data, the outcome of the semi-annual resident survey conducted by the county. This survey has a nice trend line going since 2005 and asks residents about convenience of polling place and advance voting locations.
At my budget presentation with the Board of County Commissioners last year, I said I would use this survey data to assess if the reduction of polling places would have an impact. I felt it would and if I wasn't the only one in the room who felt that way, I can only say that they didn't pipe up and agree with me.
But now, comes the survey data.
For the statement "Polling places in the County are convenient," satisfaction dropped, down from 90 percent in 2011 to 86 percent. The company the county employs to do the survey defines a four-point drop as statistically significant.
The five-survey, eight-year trend goes like this:
2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
90% 88% 90% 90% 86%
For the statement "The County has enough advanced voting locations," the trend is this:
2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
79% 77% 77% 76% 76%
My belief is that voters' expectations of advance voting sites are increasing. Voters feel they shouldn't have to travel far to them and that the lines should be short.
I'm sure the push-back I would get from our county manager is that 86 percent doesn't seem that bad. He might even point to the 2007 number showing the drop from 90 to 88 percent. That, however, came after we experimented by reducing polling places in the 2006 election from 2004 levels.
Also, survey numbers for all items measured in the county have dropped since 2005 and that could be a sign of survey fatigue, overall economic issues impacting the frame of mind of the respondents, or specific budget cuts at the county.
But if 86 percent isn't bad, what is? We are talking about a constitutional right, after all, with convenience required by federal and state laws.
Is 85 percent bad, or 80 percent? Is 76 percent bad?
Ah, 76 percent--the response to the advanced voting location question. I think the answer to improving the answer to the first question comes by dealing with this question.
Point is, there likely is more than one way to address the polling place response. The obvious one is to increase polling places.
Another, if we had a reliable post office, would be to further push voting by mail.
A third, and most timely I feel, is to improve our advance voting locations. We either need more or larger sites. Either will require more staff at our office to secure, manage, and operate.
We requested two more positions (replacing those cut) and signaled that we really need more, but those two positions are being recommended by the county manager as not funded.
If we could move the 76 percent closer to 80 (and maintaining it at 76 may be a win given the greater expectations), fewer voters will go to the polls and those who do go to the polls, theoretically at least, will find them more convenient.
As it is right now, we're likely to have fewer polling places, 2014 compared to 2010. We have no satellite advance voting locations (they can't really be secured until early 2014, but it's no gimme that any of the previous locations will be available) and aren't going to get the resources to help with that.
There's nothing on the horizon, or in the proposed budget, that would suggest the survey numbers will go anywhere but down in 2015.
We might get lucky. Despite these restrainers, we might be able to secure larger advance voting locations. Metcalf South, always iffy if we can get it again, has other space available, although we tried to secure the larger storefront there in 2012, unsuccessfully.
Or, at least, if the numbers continue this trendline, the 2015 story will be pretty compelling (as if it isn't already) that major investment needs to be made in the county's election process, ahead of the 2016 presidential election budget process.
The election involved the Olathe School District and a capital improvement plan that passed overwhelmingly.
The projects included a new high school and improved security at all schools.
I read today that the district plans "Pinch Points" at each school. I really like this new phrase linguistically but operationally, I think this points to further doom for us at the election office.
Pinch Points refers to the concept that visitors to a school have to come through a secure entrance, basically being buzzed in. This, of course, would be unworkable when using schools as polling places.
Hence the irony. An election conducted by our office for the district likely will result in the district not being able to support the election office.
I could be wrong, and, of course, this is becoming a tired message on this blog. Namely, schools' concerns with safety, voters' concerns with churches, reduced post office service levels, and increased voter expectations for advance voting locations form the largest restrainers we have to conducting elections.
Late this year, we will go through the process of assigning polling places for 2014 elections. That's when these points may start pinching.
This event coincides with our budget process and data related to the 2012 election. In 2012, the county conducted small focus groups and an online budget-cut simulation. One conclusion drawn was that people were willing to wait in line longer to vote. There was encouragement by the county manager and some members of the Board of County Commissioners to reduce polling places.
I was publicly skeptical of this conclusion. In fact, the online simulation that asked residents how they would balance the budget started with questions about the election office and the DMV. We know, of course, the impact of "top of the ballot," in elections (that's why we rotate candidate names). The design of the simulation likely created some false positives.
The same process said that waiting longer at the DMV was okay and thanks to a new computer system put in place in 2012, the DMV's "brand" has been severely damaged. Wait times there were measured in hours, not minutes.
Fact is, though, we were reducing polling places, anyway. It was the first time, presidential-election to presidential-election, that polling places decreased rather than increased. It was a signal of availability, not of my reaction to the focus groups.
I'm a pretty independent person and if I thought increasing polling places was the right thing to do, I would have, and then I would have dealt with the fall-out within the county. I said this during my budget presentation last June. In fairness, nobody "made me" reduce polling places. Further, I didn't quit some polling places--they quit us.
But, now we have new data, the outcome of the semi-annual resident survey conducted by the county. This survey has a nice trend line going since 2005 and asks residents about convenience of polling place and advance voting locations.
At my budget presentation with the Board of County Commissioners last year, I said I would use this survey data to assess if the reduction of polling places would have an impact. I felt it would and if I wasn't the only one in the room who felt that way, I can only say that they didn't pipe up and agree with me.
But now, comes the survey data.
For the statement "Polling places in the County are convenient," satisfaction dropped, down from 90 percent in 2011 to 86 percent. The company the county employs to do the survey defines a four-point drop as statistically significant.
The five-survey, eight-year trend goes like this:
2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
90% 88% 90% 90% 86%
This is bad news. Residents feel polling places are less convenient at a time when we are sure to have even fewer locations available as polling places.
For the statement "The County has enough advanced voting locations," the trend is this:
2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
79% 77% 77% 76% 76%
My belief is that voters' expectations of advance voting sites are increasing. Voters feel they shouldn't have to travel far to them and that the lines should be short.
I'm sure the push-back I would get from our county manager is that 86 percent doesn't seem that bad. He might even point to the 2007 number showing the drop from 90 to 88 percent. That, however, came after we experimented by reducing polling places in the 2006 election from 2004 levels.
Also, survey numbers for all items measured in the county have dropped since 2005 and that could be a sign of survey fatigue, overall economic issues impacting the frame of mind of the respondents, or specific budget cuts at the county.
But if 86 percent isn't bad, what is? We are talking about a constitutional right, after all, with convenience required by federal and state laws.
Is 85 percent bad, or 80 percent? Is 76 percent bad?
Ah, 76 percent--the response to the advanced voting location question. I think the answer to improving the answer to the first question comes by dealing with this question.
Point is, there likely is more than one way to address the polling place response. The obvious one is to increase polling places.
Another, if we had a reliable post office, would be to further push voting by mail.
A third, and most timely I feel, is to improve our advance voting locations. We either need more or larger sites. Either will require more staff at our office to secure, manage, and operate.
We requested two more positions (replacing those cut) and signaled that we really need more, but those two positions are being recommended by the county manager as not funded.
If we could move the 76 percent closer to 80 (and maintaining it at 76 may be a win given the greater expectations), fewer voters will go to the polls and those who do go to the polls, theoretically at least, will find them more convenient.
As it is right now, we're likely to have fewer polling places, 2014 compared to 2010. We have no satellite advance voting locations (they can't really be secured until early 2014, but it's no gimme that any of the previous locations will be available) and aren't going to get the resources to help with that.
There's nothing on the horizon, or in the proposed budget, that would suggest the survey numbers will go anywhere but down in 2015.
We might get lucky. Despite these restrainers, we might be able to secure larger advance voting locations. Metcalf South, always iffy if we can get it again, has other space available, although we tried to secure the larger storefront there in 2012, unsuccessfully.
Or, at least, if the numbers continue this trendline, the 2015 story will be pretty compelling (as if it isn't already) that major investment needs to be made in the county's election process, ahead of the 2016 presidential election budget process.
It's election day here and in many parts of the country, and I am back in the office equally refreshed and exhausted from a trip to Europe.
Here, we have an Olathe School Mail Ballot election closing at noon. Mail-ballot elections pay the postage for the voter to return ballots and typically have higher turnouts than elections at the polls.
We've noticed the turnout waning, though.
My first month on the job, we had three mail-ballot elections, and the turnout ranged from 43 to 55 percent in those elections.
In 2007 the Olathe School District had a mail-ballot election and the turnout was a smidge under 30 percent.
This election looks like it's on pace for a similar turnout. That's good news, really, because of all the worries we've had with the post office.
Indeed, the Post Office Wow Factor just kept growing while I was out. Mail-ballot election in full force, yet a week ago today we received 3 pieces of mail.
That's not 3 ballots--3 pieces!
12 trays of ballots were at the post office, but the carrier said he wasn't allowed to bring them, ostensibly because they weren't counted.
So, that's 12 trays we picked up that afternoon. That's 12 trays of ballots that wouldn't have arrived by noon had that day been election day. They've been more responsive and today called us to say they had two trays ready for either delivery or pickup, and we'll pick them up to begin processing them.
Cars have been shuffling through our parking lot all morning as persons dropped off ballots.
The city of Overland Park is meeting with us at 11, an hour before this election closes, to finalize planning for the city's October 8 mail-ballot election, and the city of Olathe is planning a separate mail-ballot election for later this year.
That's two more times this year to be frustrated sending and receiving ballots. I feel like we represent "bread and butter," for the Post Office but I can't help but feel they'd prefer we weren't around.
It conjures a yarn. In fact, I've come back from Europe with many yarns and yet election-time is a "no-yarn zone."
"Yarns," are those little one-off, somewhat interesting anecdotes and stories that might even have a point, but they are distractions when focused on a task. We try to recognize when we're caught up in a yarn during an election, and bail out of the story.
Being out for a while, this week feels like a looooonnnnnnggggg Monday, so I need a yarn to get in the groove. Here goes:
I'm a boring guy (if you've read this far into this post, you're probably not disagreeing). My diet primarily consists of Diet Dr. Pepper and dairy, usually chocolate milk but, occasionally, when there was a Baskin-Robbins near our house, a chocolate shake.
When I'd come into the Baskin-Robbins and order a shake, it was a clear day-ruiner for the workers. Their facial expressions and body language made the simple role of being a customer feel very uncomfortable.
During one visit, after making a shake, the worker turned around to start walking toward the cash register and he dropped the shake. He groaned.
"That's okay, it's not your fault," his co-worker said, icily.
Oh! I got it. That was MY fault. I ordered the shake, my last one ever there, and this act of ordering something on the menu resulted in a floor mess and an angry glare towards me. How thoughtless of me.
That Baskin-Robbins is closed now. No surprise. And that boring chocolate shake anecdote conjures up exactly how I feel with the Post Office.
How thoughtless of us to pump a half-million pieces of first-class mail through the system on behalf of voters and jurisdictions. What are we thinking, disrupting them so?
Did I mention that Baskin-Robbins is now closed?
Here, we have an Olathe School Mail Ballot election closing at noon. Mail-ballot elections pay the postage for the voter to return ballots and typically have higher turnouts than elections at the polls.
We've noticed the turnout waning, though.
My first month on the job, we had three mail-ballot elections, and the turnout ranged from 43 to 55 percent in those elections.
In 2007 the Olathe School District had a mail-ballot election and the turnout was a smidge under 30 percent.
This election looks like it's on pace for a similar turnout. That's good news, really, because of all the worries we've had with the post office.
Indeed, the Post Office Wow Factor just kept growing while I was out. Mail-ballot election in full force, yet a week ago today we received 3 pieces of mail.
That's not 3 ballots--3 pieces!
12 trays of ballots were at the post office, but the carrier said he wasn't allowed to bring them, ostensibly because they weren't counted.
So, that's 12 trays we picked up that afternoon. That's 12 trays of ballots that wouldn't have arrived by noon had that day been election day. They've been more responsive and today called us to say they had two trays ready for either delivery or pickup, and we'll pick them up to begin processing them.
Cars have been shuffling through our parking lot all morning as persons dropped off ballots.
The city of Overland Park is meeting with us at 11, an hour before this election closes, to finalize planning for the city's October 8 mail-ballot election, and the city of Olathe is planning a separate mail-ballot election for later this year.
That's two more times this year to be frustrated sending and receiving ballots. I feel like we represent "bread and butter," for the Post Office but I can't help but feel they'd prefer we weren't around.
It conjures a yarn. In fact, I've come back from Europe with many yarns and yet election-time is a "no-yarn zone."
"Yarns," are those little one-off, somewhat interesting anecdotes and stories that might even have a point, but they are distractions when focused on a task. We try to recognize when we're caught up in a yarn during an election, and bail out of the story.
Being out for a while, this week feels like a looooonnnnnnggggg Monday, so I need a yarn to get in the groove. Here goes:
I'm a boring guy (if you've read this far into this post, you're probably not disagreeing). My diet primarily consists of Diet Dr. Pepper and dairy, usually chocolate milk but, occasionally, when there was a Baskin-Robbins near our house, a chocolate shake.
When I'd come into the Baskin-Robbins and order a shake, it was a clear day-ruiner for the workers. Their facial expressions and body language made the simple role of being a customer feel very uncomfortable.
During one visit, after making a shake, the worker turned around to start walking toward the cash register and he dropped the shake. He groaned.
"That's okay, it's not your fault," his co-worker said, icily.
Oh! I got it. That was MY fault. I ordered the shake, my last one ever there, and this act of ordering something on the menu resulted in a floor mess and an angry glare towards me. How thoughtless of me.
That Baskin-Robbins is closed now. No surprise. And that boring chocolate shake anecdote conjures up exactly how I feel with the Post Office.
How thoughtless of us to pump a half-million pieces of first-class mail through the system on behalf of voters and jurisdictions. What are we thinking, disrupting them so?
Did I mention that Baskin-Robbins is now closed?
Just as in any job, vacations must be scheduled around busy
times.
Problem is, at Johnson County’s election office, we haven’t
had a slow period for more than 10 years.
We have several employees who have hit their maximum accrual
for vacation hours.
With April elections, spring break trips are out. In even years, with an August primary, summer
vacations are, likewise, a no-go.
In fact, our employees often don’t get to take the Veterans
Day Holiday in November because we’re either preparing for an election canvass
or potential recount.
The two weeks around Christmas and New Years’ Day has become
the best chance for many of us to take time away from the office. May and June in odd years usually is good,
too. We have many employees out at some
point this month.
That was my plan as well when scheduling a family vacation
that exhausted our savings and planning skills; I’m blogging right now from
Europe, on a train from London to France.
The trip was carefully scheduled around our elections, but,
of course, we now have a special election underway. I’m not sure our staff would agree, but I’m
coming to like waking up in a time zone 7 hours ahead and being able to review
and weigh in on things while they sleep.
It’s possible I’ll be blogging between now and my return,
but I wanted to post this so you knew I wasn’t loafing. Actually, I am loafing, but it was a planned
outage.
(And trivia fact for the day, when accessing Blogger in France, even logged in, all the prompts are in French).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)